SILVERFAST VS VUESCAN PRO
SILVERFAST VS VUESCAN WINDOWS

icc created by VueScan and embedded by VueScan in a DNG-raw) works very well with Lightroom. icm profile obtained with SIPC you have to generate a TIFF-raw, open it in Photoshop and apply the profile using the Photoshop function. So if you want to use a complex profile like those. icm file the resulting profiling will not be present in the final scan (I don't know if this is because VueScan doesn't embed a SIPC profile or because Lightroom doesn't understand it, what I see is that the result is identical to what I obtain with the VueScan setting of 'built-in' calibration, i.e. icm file and configure VueScan so that it points to this. If you create a more complex scanner profile using a program like SIPC, and obtain an. icc file and this profile with the configuration above will be embedded in the DNG-raw and will be 'honoured' by Lightroom. If you create a scanner profile using VueScan, you obtain a profile. I invert the negative using a Photoshop plugin, ColorPerfect by CFSystems which IMO works better than the inversion made by Photoshop. As I use Input - Media: Image VueScan does NOT make the colour inversion and I end up with a negative TIFF file. I create a TIFF-raw when I scan negatives. This file embeds the scanner profile, which Lightroom honours. I don't tick the 'Raw save film' option as I don't want VueScan to apply its own 'film specific curves' to the RAW. Instead when using option Output - Raw output with: 'Scan' the infrared channel is saved on the TIFF as a separate channel. Option 'Save' uses ICE and gives an image with 'reduced' dust/scratches.

SILVERFAST VS VUESCAN WINDOWS

In any case this options is only needed to generate the image on screen in the 'Preview' and 'Scan' windows of VueScan, it does not affect the scan file.Ĭolor - Color balance: Neutral (the scanner sets black and white points), or None (the scanner doesn't even try to set black and white points) according to taste. If you use a Linux-based system, with no colour management at system level, here you would use ICC profile and point to your monitor profile).

Input - Media: Image (this doesn't apply ANY film curve or film profile to the image and does NOT invert negative images).Ĭolor - Scanner ICC profile: points to the scanner profile (the file obtained while profiling the scanner)Ĭolor - Scanner IT8 data: points to the relevant data file distributed with your scanner target (I don't understand why this is asked, as it should be used by VueScan only during the scanner profile creation)Ĭolor - Monitor color space: sRGB (I do profile my monitor, my monitor profile is loaded at startup (WindowsXP) and is used at 'system level' and valid for all applications. I created an ICC profile of my scanner - a scanner profile not to be confused with a film profile. I scan with VueScan and a Nikon LS-5000, output a raw file, open it in Lightroom, work a bit on it and finish the work in Photoshop. Should I scan/output in RAW or TIFF?Ĭan I just perform steps 1 to 4 only? I don't understand why I need to input the RAW file back into VueScan (step 5), make additional adjustments, rescan before finally outputting for a second time. My desire is to end up with a scan file that can be manipulated as much as possible in Lightroom and other post processing programs. Make advanced adjustments in scan program

Sascha Steinhoff describes the RAW workflow (page 78) as follows:Ģ. Just reading The VueScan Bible for the second time and am confused about the process still.

SILVERFAST VS VUESCAN PRO

I don't have a scanner yet (never used one for photography) but plan on getting the upcoming Plustek Optic 120 film scanner to scan B&W 135 and 120 negatives with the intention of post processing with Lightroom 4 & Silver Efex Pro 2 and printing using an Epson 3880.

Silverfast vs vuescan